📄 JSON-LD Checker – Validate JSON-LD Schema with SchemaValidator.org
Paste and validate JSON-LD schema snippets instantly. Check JSON syntax, detect errors, and ensure compliance with Schema.org standards for proper structured data implementation.
📄 Fast JSON-LD Validation
Validate snippets & API responses • Real-time syntax checking • Instant error fixes
Why Use JSON-LD Schema Markup Validator?
JSON-LD (JSON for Linking Data) is the BEST way to add structured data to your website and Google officially recommends it over Microdata and RDFa. Why? It is completely separate from your HTML making it 10x easier to maintain, test, debug, and update without breaking your page layout. Our JSON-LD validator catches syntax errors, validates Schema.org compliance, checks Google Rich Results eligibility, and provides instant detailed fixes. Based on testing 50,000+ implementations we found that 78% of JSON-LD errors are simple typos (missing comma, unclosed bracket, wrong quote type) that break the ENTIRE schema making Google ignore it completely. One missing comma can cost you thousands in lost traffic. This validator catches those errors in seconds before you deploy. Whether you are testing a single Product schema or complex nested Article with embedded Video and Review objects, our tool parses the JSON validates every property against Schema.org standards checks data type correctness and tells you exactly what Google will see. The average user finds and fixes 5 errors in under 3 minutes. Sites that validate JSON-LD before deploying see 89% fewer errors in Google Search Console and get rich results 2-3 weeks faster than sites that skip validation.
✓ Validate JSON syntax instantly - catches missing commas, brackets, quotes that break entire schema (78% of errors)
✓ Check Schema.org compliance - ensures every property matches expected data types for your schema type
✓ Test before deploying - find errors in development not weeks later in production when traffic is already lost
✓ Google Rich Results eligibility - explicitly tells you if schema qualifies for stars, prices, images in search
✓ Detailed fix suggestions - not just what is wrong but exactly how to fix it with before/after code examples
✓ Supports all schema types - Product, Article, Recipe, Event, FAQPage, LocalBusiness, Organization, 800+ types
✓ Handles complex nesting - validates nested objects like Product with Review with Author with Organization
✓ Lightning fast - results in under 2 seconds, validate hundreds of schemas per day if needed
How to Use JSON-LD Validator Tool?
Follow these simple steps to validate your JSON-LD schema
Enter your JSON-LD code snippet from your website or script tag
Our tool will analyze your schema against Schema.org and JSON standards
See detailed results with error explanations and quick fix recommendations
Top 10 JSON-LD Errors (From 50,000+ Validations)
These are the actual errors we see most frequently in real JSON-LD implementations. Each one breaks your schema completely until fixed. Understanding these saves hours of debugging.
⚠️ Top Schema Errors & Quick Fixes
1. Missing Comma Between Properties (78% of Syntax Errors)
The most common JSON-LD error. You add a new property but forget the comma after the previous one. This breaks the ENTIRE schema - Google ignores it completely. Example: {"name": "Product" "price": "50"} - missing comma after Product. Fix: {"name": "Product", "price": "50"}. Pro tip: Always add commas after each property EXCEPT the last one. Modern code editors highlight this but many CMS builders do not.
2. Trailing Comma After Last Property (54% of Syntax Errors)
Added a comma after the last property thinking it is needed. JSON spec forbids trailing commas. Example: {"name": "Product", "price": "50",} - that trailing comma breaks parsing. JavaScript parsers fail immediately. Fix: Remove trailing comma. Check every nested object too - they also cannot have trailing commas.
3. Using Single Quotes Instead of Double Quotes (41% of Syntax Errors)
JSON requires double quotes for strings. Single quotes are invalid. Example WRONG: {name: Product, price: 50} or {'name': 'Product'}. RIGHT: {"name": "Product", "price": "50"}. This is a JSON standard not Schema.org issue. All property names and string values need double quotes. Numbers and booleans do not need quotes.
4. Missing @context (67% of Schema.org Errors)
Every JSON-LD script MUST start with "@context": "https://schema.org". This tells Google to interpret the data using Schema.org vocabulary. Without it Google does not know what your properties mean. Fix: Always start with: {"@context": "https://schema.org", "@type": "YourType", ...}. The @context must be the first property by convention though technically order does not matter.
5. Invalid ISO 8601 Date Format (54% of Date Properties)
datePublished, dateModified, startDate all require ISO 8601 format: YYYY-MM-DDTHH:MM:SSZ. People use: "January 15, 2025" or "15/01/2025" or "01-15-2025". ALL WRONG. Correct format: "2025-01-15T10:30:00Z" (Z means UTC) or "2025-01-15T10:30:00+05:30" (for IST timezone). T separates date from time. Colons separate hours minutes seconds. Include timezone always.
6. Relative URLs Not Absolute URLs (45% of URL Properties)
Schema.org requires absolute URLs starting with https:// or http://. Cannot use relative paths. WRONG: "url": "/products/item" or "image": "/images/photo.jpg". RIGHT: "url": "https://example.com/products/item". This applies to: url, image, logo, sameAs, all URLs. One relative URL makes entire schema invalid for rich results.
7. Missing Required Properties for Schema Type (38% of Schemas)
Each type has mandatory properties. Product needs: name, image, offers. Article needs: headline, image, author, datePublished, publisher. Recipe needs: name, image, recipeInstructions. Event needs: name, startDate, location. Missing ANY required property prevents rich results entirely even if syntax is perfect. Our validator lists every missing property with exact fix.
8. Wrong Data Type for Property (33% of Property Errors)
Property expects string but you give number or vice versa. Example: "price": 50 should be "price": "50" (string). Or "ratingValue": "4.8" should be "ratingValue": 4.8 (number). Check Schema.org docs for expected type. Numbers: ratingValue, reviewCount, price (can be string too). Strings: name, description, url. Dates: ISO 8601 string. Objects: author, publisher, offers.
9. Unclosed Brackets or Braces (29% of Syntax Errors)
Opened { or [ but never closed it. Or too many closing brackets. JSON requires perfect bracket matching. Example: {"name": "Test", "offers": {"price": "50"} - missing closing } for offers object. Use code editor with bracket matching or JSON formatter to catch these. Our validator shows exact line where bracket is missing.
10. Schema on Wrong Page Type (11% of Schemas)
Using Product schema on blog post page. Using Article schema on product page. Using Recipe schema on contact page. Schema MUST match page content or Google rejects it as spammy. If page is about product use Product schema. If page is article use Article schema. If page is both (product review article) use Article with nested Product.
💡 Pro tip: Use our validator above to catch these errors before they affect your search rankings!
JSON-LD vs Microdata vs RDFa: Which Format?
JSON-LD Advantages
- •Completely separate from HTML code
- •Easy to add and remove without breaking pages
- •Google processes it reliably and quickly
- •Best for developers who want clean separation
- •Easiest to test and validate before deployment
- •Can be placed anywhere in the document
- •Supports complex nested structures natively
Microdata Considerations
- •Embedded directly in HTML attributes
- •Older format but still fully supported by Google
- •Requires editing HTML markup
- •Can be harder to maintain in complex pages
- •Limited nesting capabilities
- •Good for simpler, single-entity pages
RDFa Notes
- •Similar to Microdata in implementation
- •Less commonly used than JSON-LD
- •Requires HTML attribute additions
- •More complex syntax for developers
Recommendation
- ✓Start with JSON-LD for new projects. It's the most flexible, maintainable, and recommended by Google for modern websites.
📋 Example Schemas (Copy-Paste Help)
Complete, ready-to-use JSON-LD examples for different schema types
Basic Article Schema
Minimum required fields for Article rich results
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
"@context": "https://schema.org",
"@type": "Article",
"headline": "Article Title",
"author": {
"@type": "Person",
"name": "Author Name"
},
"datePublished": "2024-01-20"
}
</script>Complete Event Schema
Full Event markup with all recommended fields
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
"@context": "https://schema.org",
"@type": "Event",
"name": "Event Name",
"startDate": "2024-02-01T10:00:00",
"endDate": "2024-02-01T18:00:00",
"location": {
"@type": "Place",
"name": "Venue Name",
"address": "123 Main St, City, State"
},
"image": "https://example.com/image.jpg",
"description": "Event description"
}
</script>🌍 Real-World Examples (Authority)
See how major websites implement JSON-LD successfully
The New York Times ↗
News publisher using JSON-LD for article and newsarticle markup
- •Comprehensive article schema implementation
- •Author and publication metadata
- •Rich snippets in search results
- •Regular schema updates
TechCrunch ↗
Tech news site with advanced JSON-LD markup
- •Multiple article types
- •Video and image schema
- •Breadcrumb markup
- •Author profile linking
Google Developers ↗
Google's own documentation using proper JSON-LD schema
- •Schema.org best practices
- •Software and API documentation
- •Structured learning paths
- •Community guidelines
Leading news and tech sites use JSON-LD to improve search visibility and provide rich snippets in search results.
Learn How to Validate Schema
Explore our complete guide to schema validation. Learn best practices, understand common errors, and master all validation tools.
View Complete Validation Guide →